Legal Opinion
Mance v. Board of Directors of the Public Employees' Retirement Fund
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 20, 1995No. 82A01-9408-CV-280PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
We are asked to decide whether a trial judge's "salary," which is used to calculate retirement benefits, includes the voluntary salary supplement that counties may pay their judges ("county supplement"). Kathy-lyn Stuart Mance and William D. Stephens, individually and as representatives of a class of retired judges and their beneficiaries (collectively the "Class"), challenge the administration of the judges' retirement fund by the Board of Directors of the Public Employees' Retirement Fund ("Board"). The Class filed a claim with the Board for unpaid…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Indiana State Board of Public Welfare v. Tioga Pines Living Center, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Jewell Grain Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Hatcher v. Lake Superior Court, Room ThreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement Fund v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Miller Brewing Co. v. Bartholemew County Beverage Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Blackmon v. DuckworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Randall L. Schmitt v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Indiana Department of Natural Resources v. Town of SyracuseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.