Legal Opinion

Bardin v. Commercial Insurance & Trust

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 1909No. 7147PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before Dantzeer, J., Florence, March term, 1908. Action by M. W. Bardin et al. against Commercial Insurance and Trust Company. From judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. cite: Proof of adverse possession: Dud., 177; 14 S. C., 594; 22 S. C., 361; 62 S. C., 195; 45 S. C., 312; 64 S. C., 488. Proof of title: 53 S. C., 216.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This action was to recover a tract of land in Florence county containing two hundred and thirty-one acres. The answer, besides a general denial, plead the Statute of Limitations, adverse possession and presumption of a grant. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, defendant moved for a nonsuit on the grounds that there was no evidence of a grant or presumption of a grant from the State, and no testimony tending to show that plaintiff and defendant claimed from a common source. This motion being overruled defendant submitted no testi…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Epperson v. StansillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  2. Busby v. Florida &c. R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  3. Kilgore v. KirklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  4. Duren v. KeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  5. Kolb v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Terwilliger v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  2. Terwilliger v. DanielsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Saluda Land & Lumber Co. v. FortnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Seacoast Timber Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API