Shippee v. Shippee
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
No question is raised concerning the jurisdiction of the parties to the divorce action that was brought in California.
Nor can there be any doubt of the power of the Superior Court in that state to enter the nunc pro tunc decree that it did as of October 24, 1945. “Whenever either of the parties in a divorce action is, under the law, entitled to a final judgment, but by mistake, negligence or inadvertence the same has not been signed, filed or entered-, if no appeal has been taken from the interlocutory judgment or motion for a new trial made, the court, on the motion of either party thereto…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merrick v. MerrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Bannister v. BannisterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Mock v. ChaneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cahoon v. PeltonUtah Supreme Court · 1959
- In the Matter of the Estate of Joaquin Cruz Leon GuerreroSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
- In Re the Estate of ShippyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Owen v. StewartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Cahoon v. PeltonUtah Supreme Court · 1959