Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Gilman

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for services.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

At the conclusion of the testimony the defendant renewed the motion made and denied at the end of the plaintiff’s case to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to establish any legal contract and that, if he had established any contract at all between himself and the decedent, whose executor he was suing, it was an illegal and void contract. The court reserved decision of the motion and submitted two questions of fact to the jury in manner following:

Question 1. Was the plaintiff, between the 30th day of October, 1907, and the 27th day of August, 1912, employed by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harris v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. People v. . HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Gray v. . HookNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  4. Rose & Hawley v. TruaxNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  5. People Ex Rel. Lichtenstein v. . LanganNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spiess v. LindeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API