Eicheler v. Hanggi
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants (partners as the St. Paul Furniture Company) from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $2,000 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This action is to recover for injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants in respect to the condition of a circular saw upon which the plaintiff was called to work. The defendants, as.partners, were carrying on a manufacturing business, in which they employed machinery run by steam-power, among which was this circular rip-saw, set in a frame-work, on which was a wooden table, through which the saw projected from below; the axis of the saw being beneath the table. On this table the ma*264terial to be sawed was intended to rest, the operator sliding it along the table'…
2Cited by7 opinions
- South Baltimore Car Works v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
- Bateman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Jennings v. Iron Bay Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Commissioners v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.