Peterson v. State

Jordan, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of possessing nontax-paid liquor. His amended motion for new trial was denied, and he excepted to that judgment. Held:

1. The evidence adduced on the trial of this case in behalf of the State, which disclosed that the arresting officers entered and searched the defendant’s home for nontax-paid liquor under the authority of a search warrant, that a quantity of nontax-paid liquor was found on the premises, and that the defendant admitted that said liquor belonged to him, was sufficient to authorize the verdict rendered; and the general…