Legal Opinion
United States v. David Wayne Holland, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 24, 1994No. 92-8596PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Chief Judge:
In this appeal, David Wayne Holland challenges his convictions and sentences on three counts of perjury. 1 By cross-appeal, the Government contends that the sentences imposed by the district court fail to conform to the requirements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3551-3586 (1988), and the guidelines promulgated thereunder. Specifically, the Government challenges the district court’s rejection of the probation officer’s recommendation that Holland’s base offense levels be enhanced by four levels to reflect his leadership role in the offenses, see United…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Samuel ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Darlene Faye MogelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Ramon Gonzalez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Narrciso CarrilloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jerry Valle, Jorge Antonio GochisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. Charles W. Walker, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Mahendra Pratap GuptaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Francis Everett Foree and Christina DrazninCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Charles A. Eidson, Sandra A. EidsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.