Legal Opinion
Now v. Operation Rescue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 89-2968-LFOPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
An Order filed January 20, 1990 denied defendants’ motion to dismiss, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, and entered a permanent injunction enjoining defendants from, inter alia, “trespassing on, blockading, impeding or obstructing access to or egress from any facility at which abortions, family planning, or gynecological services are performed in the District of Columbia.” See Permanent Injunction at 2-3. The injunction was based on reasons to be amplified in a forthcoming Memorandum. This is that Memorandum.
I
Plaintiffs include four health…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Women's Health Care Services P.A. v. Operation Rescue-NationalDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MID-IOWA. v. MakiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- National Organization for Women v. Operation RescueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Am. Hosp. Ass'n v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- NOW v. Operation RescueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.