Zuckerman v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurrence
Fein, J. (concurring).
I concur in the views expressed by Justice Lupiano and in the result reached by the majority opinion, except with respect to the dictum expressed by Justice Sandler which intimates that one party to an action should be required to appear with respect to an application for relief sought solely as against another party.
This is close to the position taken by the dissenters, who without authority, would foreclose the City from its right to continue with its cross claim against its codefendant the Transit Authority, merely because the City did not appear in opposition to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Nolechek v. GesualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.