Legal Opinion
Julian Fox and James Henry Stanford v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1967No. 20951, 20952PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PECKHAM, District Judge:
Following a trial before a jury the appellants Julian Fox and James Henry Stanford were convicted of conspiracy to smuggle marijuana, and of a substantive charge of smuggling marijuana from Mexico into the United States.
The District Court had jurisdiction under Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 3231, and 21 U.S.C. § 176a. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1294.
Count 1 of the indictment charged that appellants and coindictees Olivia Ann Barnes, Allison Steward, Elmer A. D. Munns, and unindicted co-conspirator Shirley Jean Gainer and divers other persons to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Alejandrino Diaz-Rosendo and Felix Anenson Fernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Robert Lewis Eason and Kenneth Lamoyne Nowlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Salomon R. Sandez, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Bruce Dunn, Richard Austin Mandeville, Joseph Harvey Zeligs, Darold Lanier Milligan, Richard Lee ShinafeltCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Susanne M. Hutchinson, United States of America v. Gordon EnnisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Thomas Nicholas MarottaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. David R. HuberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.