Legal Opinion

People v. Hamilton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 20, 2002No. 1-97-3926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

Kevin Hamilton literally talked himself into the penitentiary. His conviction by a jury of the first degree murder of Curtis Jackson was based almost entirely on his oral and written statements. He was sentenced to 41 years in the Department of Corrections.

On appeal, the defendant contends: (1) his statement should have been suppressed; (2) too much gang fife evidence was admitted; (3) his prior conviction for possession of a controlled substance should not have been admitted to impeach his credibility; (4) he was denied a fair trial when the State made improper remarks during closing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Ohler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. SteidlIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. EmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. JamesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. People v. JaimesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. People v. SuasteguiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. People v. ValladeresAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API