Legal Opinion
Kourofsky v. Genencor International, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided October 23, 2006No. 04-CV-6327LPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
This is an action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The three plaintiffs, Kerry Kourofsky, Wayne Newman, and William Sperr, allege that their former employer, Genencor International, Inc. (“Genencor”), terminated their employment in March 2003, on account of their age. Genencor has moved for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
Genencor is a company involved in biotechnology; it develops and sells biochemi-eals for use in various types of applications. All three plaintiffs previously worked at Genencor’s…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Saenger v. Montefiore Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Davis v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Foster v. Humane Society of Rochester & Monroe County, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Powell v. Dallas Morning News L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
- Davis v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency,et AlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.