Legal Opinion

In Re Paternity of RM

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 2010No. 45A04-1001-JP-14Published

1Opinion of the Court

939 N.E.2d 1114 (2010)

In re the Paternity of R.M.

K.B., Appellant-Petitioner,

v.

S.M., Appellee-Defendant.

No. 45A04-1001-JP-14.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

December 30, 2010.

Robert M. Hess, Andrew P. Martin, Sachs & Hess, P.C., St. John, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.

Matthew T. Albaugh, Jaimie L. Zibrowski, Baker & Daniels LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

BROWN, Judge.

K.B. ("Putative Father") appeals the trial court's order granting the motion filed by S.M. ("Mother") to dismiss his petition to establish paternity of Mother's child, R.M., based on the doctrine of laches. Because…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Speidel v. HenriciSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API