Legal Opinion

State v. Valenzuela

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1977No. 3841-PRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

Following his conviction for the unlawful sale of narcotic drugs, the appellant, Eduardo Flores Valenzuela, was placed on six years’ probation on November 4, 1974. Among the conditions of his probation, ap pellant was ordered to violate no law and was also ordered to enter the Arizona Family, a 24-hour drug treatment facility where he was to remain until he either successfully completed the program or was given permission to leave by his probation officer or the facility’s counselors. A petition to revoke appellant’s probation was filed on May 26, 1976 in which it was alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Mendelsohn v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Frye v. South Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Daru v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. State v. OjedaArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. LaughterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API