Legal Opinion

The Indrapura

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 18, 1916No. 4757PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by the British & Foreign Marine Insurance Company, Limited, against the Portland & Asiatic Steamship Company, the steamship Indrapura, the Indrapura Steamship Company, Limited, claimant, in which the Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company intervened.

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

What has previously been determined on exceptions to the libel in this case I find no occasion for *854amending or modifying. By averment in the libel it appears that the-steamship Indrapura was put in dry dock without maritime necessity therefor. Controverting this averment, two of the respondents answer that it is true the Indrapura was put into dry dock with a partial' cargo on board, but that this was done in pursuance of a usage and custom which was general as to the port of Hong Kong and the ports of the Orient and of the world, and that such usage and custom, as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barnard v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Robinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Hostetter v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vulcanite Roofing Co. v. Commonwealth S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
  2. The St. PaulDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  3. The OlderDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
  4. The SalvoreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1931
  5. Baugh Chemical Co. v. Davison Chemical Co.Baltimore City Circuit Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API