Taylor v. Muss
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMcNally, J.
Defendant-appellant prior to answer seeks the dismissal of the amended complaint for insufficiency, lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter and the pendency of a prior action for the same cause. We conclude the amended complaint is insufficient.
On February 23, 1956, in the City and County of New York, plaintiff-respondent Anne Taylor, the mother, and defendant-appellant, the putative father of the infant plaintiff, entered into an agreement providing for the payment by defendant-appellant of sums aggregating $130,000, of' which $90,000 was for the benefit of the mother and $40,000 was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fleischman v. . FurguesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Red Robin Stores, Inc. v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Dorn v. DornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Kendall v. Oakland Golf ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Kendall v. Oakland Golf ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goldfarb v. GoldfarbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982