Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Muss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcNally, J.

Defendant-appellant prior to answer seeks the dismissal of the amended complaint for insufficiency, lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter and the pendency of a prior action for the same cause. We conclude the amended complaint is insufficient.

On February 23, 1956, in the City and County of New York, plaintiff-respondent Anne Taylor, the mother, and defendant-appellant, the putative father of the infant plaintiff, entered into an agreement providing for the payment by defendant-appellant of sums aggregating $130,000, of' which $90,000 was for the benefit of the mother and $40,000 was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fleischman v. . FurguesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Red Robin Stores, Inc. v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Dorn v. DornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Kendall v. Oakland Golf ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Kendall v. Oakland Golf ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldfarb v. GoldfarbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API