Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Clinton Manges). Clinton Manges, Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1984No. 84-3791PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
This case presents an issue of first impression in this circuit. Appellant Clinton Manges contends that his fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination requires the district court to quash a documentary subpoena directed not to Manges, but to the bookkeeper of his sole proprietorship. The district court disagreed. On the facts presented, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
In its investigation of possible criminal conduct by certain bank loan officers and loan recipients, a federal grand jury directed a subpoena duces tecum to Nada Lee Robertson, a bookkeeper with the Duval…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled February 14, 1978. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Viken YacoubianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Charles Ira BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Jacob F. Butcher, Debtor-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. John H. Bailey, Iii, Trustee, Trustee in Bankruptcy-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Paul Masuru OnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.