Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1975No. 6847PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REDMANN, Judge.

Injured at work in August 1968, plaintiff continued to work until May 1969, when his back was operated on. He thereafter received sickness and accident benefits in accordance with his union’s contract with his employer, until June 1971 when he began to receive retirement benefits. Suit for workmen’s compensation was filed March 20, 1972 and was dismissed as per-empted.

Appellant theorizes that the employer is estopped from invoking the time bar, as in Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans, 1972, 260 La. 728, 257 So.2d 385.

The trial court rejected plaintiff’s contradicted testimony…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dupaquier v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. International Lubricant Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Ridenour v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API