United States v. Steinschreiber
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Chief Judge.
Defendants SIDNEY STEINSCHREIBER, d/b/a SIDCAPS LABORATORIES and NORMAN CAPPEL have moved to dismiss the indictment for legal insufficiency in that the allegation that defendants unlawfully transported unlicensed “normal human plasma” does not charge a violation of the statute — Title 42 U.S.C. § 262(a) and (b); that if construed to charge such a violation the statute is unconstitutional for vagueness.
Counts 1-3 and 7 of the indictment, charge the defendant Sidney Steinschreiber with sending, carrying and bringing for sale of normal human plasma, a product analogous to a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Berger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cunningham v. MacNeal Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- United States v. CaliseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- United States v. Sun Myung MoonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Cunningham v. MacNeal Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- Maxine Blank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.