Legal Opinion

United States v. Steinschreiber

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 25, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, Chief Judge.

Defendants SIDNEY STEINSCHREIBER, d/b/a SIDCAPS LABORATORIES and NORMAN CAPPEL have moved to dismiss the indictment for legal insufficiency in that the allegation that defendants unlawfully transported unlicensed “normal human plasma” does not charge a violation of the statute — Title 42 U.S.C. § 262(a) and (b); that if construed to charge such a violation the statute is unconstitutional for vagueness.

Counts 1-3 and 7 of the indictment, charge the defendant Sidney Steinschreiber with sending, carrying and bringing for sale of normal human plasma, a product analogous to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Berger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. MacNeal Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. United States v. CaliseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. United States v. Sun Myung MoonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Cunningham v. MacNeal Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Maxine Blank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API