Legal Opinion

People v. Lilly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant made an insufficient factual showing to warrant disclosure of all "use of force” reports prepared by the arresting officer (see, Civil *976Rights Law § 50-a [2]; see also, People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 550). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), establishes that the officer sustained "physical injury” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; see, People v Godbold, 207 AD2d 1008; People v Mallard, 207 AD2d 1018; People v Soto, 184 AD2d 673, lv denied 80 NY2d 910). The jury verdict finding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. SotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. MallardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API