Fowlkes v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.
This case presents for review a trial judge’s ruling, pursuant to Maryland Rule 4-215, that Jeffrey Fowlkes, a/k/a Anthony Johnson, appellant, who had discharged his counsel, represent himself at trial. We find no error; therefore, we will affirm.
Effective July 1, 1984, the Court of Appeals promulgated Maryland Rule 4-215, Waiver of Counsel, which included subsection (d), as follows: 1(d) Discharge of counsel—Waiver.—If a defendant requests permission to discharge an attorney whose appear anee has been entered, the court shall permit the defendant to explain the reasons…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ronald Maynard v. Larry MeachumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Willie L. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- James Edward Wilks v. Thomas Israel, Warden, Wisconsin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- State v. HarperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- State v. RenshawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fowlkes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Argabright v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Moreland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Argabright v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988