Legal Opinion

Fowlkes v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 27, 1986No. 862, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

This case presents for review a trial judge’s ruling, pursuant to Maryland Rule 4-215, that Jeffrey Fowlkes, a/k/a Anthony Johnson, appellant, who had discharged his counsel, represent himself at trial. We find no error; therefore, we will affirm.

Effective July 1, 1984, the Court of Appeals promulgated Maryland Rule 4-215, Waiver of Counsel, which included subsection (d), as follows: 1(d) Discharge of counsel—Waiver.—If a defendant requests permission to discharge an attorney whose appear anee has been entered, the court shall permit the defendant to explain the reasons…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ronald Maynard v. Larry MeachumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Willie L. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. James Edward Wilks v. Thomas Israel, Warden, Wisconsin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. State v. HarperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. State v. RenshawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fowlkes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Argabright v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Moreland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Argabright v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API