Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Mayor

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 15, 1859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application for a new trial. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.*—Daly, F. J.

The first question in this case is, whether the plaintiff conld be examined as witnessdy, his own behalf, in an action against the corporation of the city NewYork. By section 399 of the Code, the examination of a party as a witness on his own behalf, is conditional. It can be had where the adverse party, or person in interest, is living, unless the opposite party is the assignee, administrator, executor, or legal representative of a deceased person. It is objected that the defendants here are not, within the meaning of the section, a living party, but an artificial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trustees of Watertown v. Cowen & BaggNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  2. Wilson v. Mayor of New YorkCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Van Wormer v. Mayor of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  4. Falls & Smith v. BelknapNew York Supreme Court · 1806

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Memphis &. Charleston R. R. v. WhitfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Gordon v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Clemence v. City of AuburnNew York Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Mairs v. Manhattan Real Estate Ass'nThe Superior Court of New York City · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API