Legal Opinion

In Re AD

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2002No. 00-0337PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

73 S.W.3d 244 (2002)

In the Interest of A. D., a child.

No. 00-0337.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Argued March 28, 2001.

Decided April 11, 2002.

Rehearing Overruled May 30, 2002.

Rhonda Amkraut Pressley, John Cornyn, Atty. Gen. of State of Texas, Andy Taylor, First Assistant Atty. Gen., Howard G. Baldwin, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, for Petitioner.

Michael Calvin Abbott, Orange, for Respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · O'NeillJustice O'Neill

Until 1997, the Family Code provided that trial courts retain jurisdiction for four years from the time a current child-support obligation ended to enter an order directing the obligor's employer to withhold…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mellinger v. City of Houston (Tex. 1-18-1887)Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Ex Parte AbellTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Baker Hughes, Inc. v. KECO R. & D., INC.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Harrison v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. In the Interest of A. D.Texas Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dise v. DiseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Sprouse v. SprouseTexas Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API