Legal Opinion

Shattuck v. Burlington Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 9, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Jackson District Court. — Hon. Walter I. Hayes, Judge. Action on a policy of insurance. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

^agreedaBpTOaoft:re-hen quired. I. Appellant files what purports to be an agreed abstract of record. The only evidence the abstract contains of its being an agreed one are these words across the front or title page: “Agreed abstract of record.” Appellee’s amended abstract expressly denies that the abstract is an agreed one, and appellant *378makes no further showing of the fact. With that state of the record, we must assume that appellee’s statement is correct. Without a denial by appellee the endorsement or statement on appellant’s abstract would have been accepted as true, but after the denial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Hassett v. HassettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Cartwright v. CopessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fairbairn v. HaisletSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Kunz v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Hendericks v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Hoffman v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Knott v. BessmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API