State v. Beebe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The defendant was convicted of the crime of larceny in the district court for Waseca county. He removes the cause to this court by appeal. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Ripley, Oh. J.
The defendant was indicted with others for larceny in the district court for Waseca county. Upon being arraigned, he moved to set the indictment aside, because it was not found, indorsed or presented as prescribed by the law relating to grand juries, in this : — that there was no legal evidence before the grand jury upon which the indictment was found •, that there was illegal evidence used by the grand jury; that the names of certain witnesses Avere indorsed on the indictment, who were not sworn or examined by or before said grand jury during the examination or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shannon v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. KimballU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- Wadley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- Gitchell v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. CrillySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.