Legal Opinion

Joseph v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 1, 2014No. 13-10639Relating-toCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice KENNEDYand Justice SOTOMAYORwould grant the petition for a writ of certiorari.

Statement of Justice KAGAN, with whom Justice GINSBURG and Justice BREYER join, respecting the denial of certiorari.

The courts of appeals have wide discretion to adopt and apply "procedural rules governing the management of litigation." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 , 146, 106 S.Ct. 466 , 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). But that discretion is not unlimited. Procedural rules of course must yield to constitutional and statutory requirements. Id., at 148, 106 S.Ct. 466 .…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. Frank M. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Kendrick Eugene DuldulaoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
  2. Broidy Capital Management LLC v. Nicolas MuzinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Reginald L. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API