Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Taylor

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 2, 1981PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

A judge of the Superior Court denied a pretrial motion by the defendant George D. Taylor to suppress evidence and the defendant was thereafter tried by jury and convicted of the crime of knowingly buying, receiving, and aiding in the concealment of stolen property with a value over $100 (G. L. c. 266, § 60), consisting of assorted items of antique jewelry. The Appeals Court reversed, holding that the pretrial motion should have been allowed because there was a fatal defect in the warrant pursuant to which the evidence was seized. 10 Mass. App. Ct. 452 (1980). We granted further appellate…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. FreibergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. DiBenedettoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. SheppardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. KirouacMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API