Legal Opinion

Arey v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1911Published

Appeal by defendant from Justice, J. From "WASHINGTON. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Chief Justice Clark.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee. CuriaM.

Revisal, 453, requiring a defendant in ejectment to give bond before putting in a defense to tbe action, does not abridge tbe power of tbe court to appoint a receiver to secure tbe rents and profits. Kron v. Dennis, 90 N. C., 327 ; Durant v. Crowell, 97 N. C., 374.

In tbe present case tbe insolvency of the defendant was admitted, and for that reason and on account of other matters made to appear to tbe court, tbe judge, instead of accepting a bond, appointed a receiver to take charge of tbe property pending tbe litigation. This is an application by tbe defendant to this Court for a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bynum v. . PoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Kron v. . DennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API