In re S Children

*248{¶38} I respectfully dissent from the majority's opinion. While I understand the desire to permit an agency to appeal a permanent-custody decision, In re Adams , 115 Ohio St.3d 86, 2007-Ohio-4840, 873 N.E.2d 886, disallows this appeal.

{¶39} In Adams , the Ohio Supreme Court addressed whether it had jurisdiction to review a children-services agency's appeal of a judgment denying the agency's motion to modify temporary custody to permanent custody, and continuing temporary custody. The court held that the judgment did not qualify as a final, appealable order under either R.C. 2505.02(B)(1) or…