Legal Opinion

Scholl v. Margulis

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 8, 1926Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

A general demurrer was sustained to the petition of Mrs. Scholl, seeking damages against appellee, Margulis, and when she failed to amend or further plead the court dismissed her cause. Later her motion to file an amended petition was overruled, and this appeal results.

The material averments of the petition to which the general demurrer was sustained, read:

“On or about September 6, 1923, the defendant, Sam Margulis, trading as M. Margulis, operated a store at the intersection of Preston and Breckinridge streets, in the city of Louisville,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Jellico Coal Co. v. HeltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Hart v. RothCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Schmidt v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Coleman-Clark Grocery Co. v. Covington Bros.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API