Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aguirre-Mata v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 2003No. 2115-00Published

1Dissent

JOHNSON, J.,

dissenting in which PRICE, J., joined.

In Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 243, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969) the United States Supreme Court held that due process requires an adequate record illustrating that a defendant’s guilty plea was “intelligent and voluntary.” The Court further held that the record must show that a defendant who pleads guilty “has a full understanding of what the plea connotes and of its consequences.” Id. Here appellant was sentenced to ninety-nine years confinement. Is there a more direct consequence of a plea than incarceration? How can a guilty…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API