Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Cramer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 17, 1934No. 3003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTHALL, Justice.

Statement of the Nature and Result of the Suit.

This case presents an appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege.

Appellee, Wm.' M. Oramer, as plaintiff in the court below, filed his original petition in the district ’court of Dallas county on the 27th day of. December, 1932, in which he sued, as trustee for Mrs. Dorothy Schneider, Joseph W. Bailey, Jr., a resident of Dallas county, Tex., as the sole defendant. In such petition appellee alleged that James Cornell had executed a note, mineral deed (conveying mineral interests in Pecos county), and escrow agreement,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. D. S. Cage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Henderson Grain Co. v. RussTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Lasater v. WaitsTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Padgett v. Lake Cisco Amusement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Abilene v. OverstreetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sisco v. SklarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Cornell v. CramerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Sisco v. SklarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API