Wilson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SILBERMAN, Judge.
Clarence Wilson seeks review of his convictions and consecutive life sentences for the offenses of sexual battery with physical *317force and kidnapping. Wilson argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal as to the kidnapping charge because the movement and confinement of the victim was inconsequential or inherent in the sexual battery offense. We agree and reverse the kidnapping conviction and sentence. We affirm the conviction and life sentence for sexual battery with physical force without comment.
The State presented evidence that Wilson…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Faison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Harkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Simpkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Dean Kenneth Rockmore v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Joshua Daneel Gloston v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Dewayne Graham v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
- Dewayne Graham v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016