Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holzel v. Mathews

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1981Published

1DissentLupiano, J.

The appeal herein is from an order of Trial Term denying the motion of defendant Codman & Shurtleff, Inc., the manufacturer of a rongeur (a surgical instrument used to cut bone), for permission to fully participate in the medical malpractice panel hearing, in this matter. The defendant-appellant seeks not to vacate the medical malpractice mediation panel’s finding, but seeks permission to participate meaningfully in the future hearing. The order is in my view appealable (cf. Conklin v Montefiore Hosp. & Med. Center, 74 AD2d 792; Calvin v Schlossman, 74 AD2d 265). I adhere to the conceptual…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conklin v. Montefiore Hospital & Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Calvin v. SchlossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API