Legal Opinion

Springer v. Springer

California Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1899No. L.A. No. 756Published

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from orders denying a new trial and denying a motion to amend the statement. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

—Motion to dismiss the appeal for want of a sufficient undertaking.

Judgment herein was entered in the superior court in favor of the defendants October 31, 1898, and on April 24, 1899, the plaintiff’s motion fo¿r a new trial was denied, and on the same day an order was made denying a motion made by the plaintiff to amend her statement. April 29th the plaintiff served and filed upon the defendants a notice of appeal from the judg ment, and also from the orders denying a new trial, and denying her motion to amend the statement. June 10th, the attorney for the respondents signed a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carey v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Forni v. YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Forni v. YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API