Legal Opinion
Villalona v. 21st Mortgage Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 27, 2016No. 4D15-4151Published
1Opinion of the Court
On Respondent’s Motion for Clarification
GERBER, J.
Respondent has moved to clarify our May 4, 2016 opinion because the opinion did not reflect that Petitioner was entitled to attorneys’ fees as costs under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(d) only because the mortgage and note defined attorneys’ fees as costs. Having considered Respondent’s motion and Petitioner’s agreement in response, we withdraw our May 4, 2016 opinion and substitute the following opinion in its place.
The defendant in a foreclosure action petitions for certiorari review of the circuit court’s order denying her motion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Variety Children's Hosp. v. Mt. Sinai Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Air Turbine Technology, Inc. v. Quarles & Brady, LLC, Quarles & Brady, LLP and Richard HornDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Charles G. Nolan v. Mia Real Holdings, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Albertson's, Inc. v. NeilDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001