Legal Opinion
Comeq, Inc. v. Mitternight Boiler Works
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 27, 1984No. 82-1134, 82-1261PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Facts
Appellant, Comeq, Inc., is a machine tool importer and distributor with offices in Baltimore, Maryland. Its business is the purchase and reselling of heavy machinery and equipment purchased by Comeq from various manufacturers.
One machine sold by Comeq is an "angle bending roll" manufactured by a company called "Swedish Tool," which markets its products under the name of "Roundo." That machine is used in the steel fabricating industry to roll angles, channels and beams into circular shapes to be used for supports. It is a standard machine, listed in the Roundo catalog and manufactured…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tcp Industries, Inc. v. Uniroyal, Inc., Donald C. FresneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Snyder v. Herbert Greenbaum & Associates, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Neri v. Retail Marine Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Burgess Min. & Const. Corp. v. LeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Teradyne, Inc. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc., Teradyne, Inc. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Med Plus Properties v. COLCOCK CONST.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- R.E. Davis Chemical Corp. v. Diasonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Cobbs v. Fred Burgos Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- H.C. Schmieding Produce Co. v. CagleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Malone v. Carl Kisabeth Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.