Legal Opinion

Smith v. Butler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJaycox, J.

The plaintiff, the vendee, under a contract of sale, brought this action to recover the earnest money paid by him upon signing the contract, and the expenses of examining the title. The contract upon which the action is based recited that a foreclosure action “ for the purpose of straightening out the title ” was then pending, and the title should be closed after the termination of that action provided the defendant became the purchaser, and with proper provisions for returning the earnest money if the defendant did not purchase at the foreclosure sale. The purchase price under the contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knolls v. . BarnhartNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Carpenter v. . CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. City of Albany v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. In Re the Probate of the Will of WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Brooks v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Puente De Brooklyn Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Bamonte v. Ocean Beach-Fire Island Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Eckman v. MeliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Smith v. WhitneyNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Eller v. Loch Sheldrake Improvement Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API