Legal Opinion

State v. Helgoth

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 29, 1985No. 66391PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for abuse of a child, § 568.060, RSMo 1978.1 In light of defendant’s challenges to the validity of that statute, we have jurisdiction of this appeal. Mo. Const, art. V, § 3. We affirm.

Defendant was convicted of photographing a child less than seventeen years old engaging in a “prohibited sexual act” within the meaning of § 568.060. He took posed photographs of a girl under seventeen, focusing on her uncovered breasts and vagina. That section, as pertinent, makes it illegal to photograph a child less than seventeen years old engaging in “nudity, if…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OakesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. State v. DuggarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. State v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. JeffreySupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API