Legal Opinion

Durland v. Prickett

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1935No. 7,299PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

Plaintiff, the duly elected, qualified and acting surveyor of Yellowstone county, brought this action against two members of the board of county commissioners and their bondsmen, to recover damages claimed to have been sustained as a result of the defendant commissioners hiring other surveyors to perform services which, it is alleged, were a part of the lawful duties of the plaintiff.

The complaint is in six counts. A general demurrer, challenging the sufficiency of each count, was filed. The trial court sustained the demurrer to the first, fifth and sixth counts, and overruled it as to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Langston v. CurrieMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Dolenty v. Broadwater CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. the Leader Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. Foot v. BurrMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State ex rel. Daly v. DryburghMontana Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HoltMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. DriscollMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. Freebourn v. Merchants' Credit Service, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Riley v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API