Legal Opinion

Rayson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1954No. 26576PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

*104Upon appellant’s arraignment in this case it was learned by the trial court that he was indigent and unable to employ counsel to represent him. Thereupon, in obedience to the mandate of Art. 4§4, C. C. P., as well as the due process clause of our State and Federal Constitutions, the trial court appointed J. W. Birdwell, Esq., an attorney of the Palo Pinto County Bar, to represent appellant.

The record affirmatively reflects that the attorney so appointed represented the appellant upon the trial.

After the trial and after notice of appeal had been given, Attorney Birdwell died.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Essary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Cassell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Cassell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. David v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Gates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Fite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Dickson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API