Legal Opinion

Bill Beverage Et Ux v. Pullman & comley/morris

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2014No. CV-13-0170-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice BERCH,

opinion of the court.

¶ 1 This Court granted review to determine whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that Arizona courts have specific jurisdiction over a Connecticut lawyer and law firm retained by Arizona residents to provide an opinion letter regarding a tax-shelter transaction.

¶2 After considering the briefs and oral arguments, we conclude that the court of appeals did not err and that Arizona courts have jurisdiction over the defendants in this case. That court’s opinion respected Arizona’s rule permitting the liberal exercise of personal jurisdiction, see…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Planning Group of Scottsdale, L.L.C. v. Lake Mathews Mineral Properties, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Beverage v. Pullman & Comley, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoag v. Hon. french/wellsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. Malcomson v. ImvuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. Picus v. Kushner CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  4. State v. PryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API