Legal Opinion

In re Carmichael

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 12, 1990No. Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 735PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent, Wayne F. Carmichael, wilfully abandoned a legal matter entrusted to him by a client to the detriment of that client in violation of Standard 44. The Respondent also failed to promptly account for property entrusted to him in a fiduciary capacity in violation of Standards 61, 62, and 63 of State Bar Rule 4-102 of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia. The Respondent further failed to file a response to the client’s complaint or to cooperate with the Investigative Panel in its investigation of the complaint in violation of Standard 68 of State Bar Rule 4-102.

*324Decided…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re HousmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API