Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Camilleri v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2010No. S-09-0242Published

1Concurrence

BURKE, Justice,

specially concurring, with whom VOIGT, Justice, joins.

[¶37] I concur in the result reached by the majority but write separately for two reasons. First, I would commend, rather than criticize, the Medical Commission for its thoroughness and detailed explanations of its credibility determinations. Second, in light of those explanations, it is not the function of this Court to reweigh the Commission's ered-ibility determinations.

[¶38] It is difficult to imagine a more comprehensive written decision than the Medical Commission's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Dale v. S & S Builders, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Grutski v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Olivas v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Chavez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API