Legal Opinion

United States v. Andrews

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 6, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Law. Indictment of A. I). Andrews for mailing an obscene letter. Heard on demurrer.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, District Judge.

The demurrer in this case raises the question whether a private, sealed letter, upon the envelope of which there is nothing hut the name and address of the person to whom it is sent, is within the prohibition of section 3893 of the Revised Statutes, as amended by the act of September 26, 1888, (25 Stat. 496,) by which amendment the word “letter” was included in the list of articles made nonmailable by reason of their obscene, lewd, lascivious, or otherwise improper character. In support of the demurrer the counsel for the defendant relies upon a very recent decision of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. NathanDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1894
  2. United States v. JanesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1896
  3. Lehigh Val. R. Co. v. RaineyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. United States v. LingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1894
  5. United States v. WarnerDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API