Legal Opinion

Reuter v. Reuter

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 7, 1992No. 2900534PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, Judge.

After an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court divorced the parties and found that according to stipulation the parties had divided all property and debts. It set out provisions for child maintenance and support and awarded the wife $12,000 as alimony in gross “for her support and maintenance.” The *736husband appeals, contending that the trial court erred in awarding the alimony in gross. We affirm.

At the outset we note that, after an ore tenus proceeding, the judgment of the trial court is presumed correct and will be set aside only when it is plainly and palpably wrong. Lucero…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lucero v. LuceroCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. Brannon v. BrannonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte ReuterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API