Legal Opinion

Sasanow v. Williamsburg Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 6, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, as resettled, denying motion for an order dismissing the complaint for insufficiency, pursuant to rule 106, subdivision 5, of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The action is maintainable in equity. A complete adjudication of the controversy requires the presence of the appellant as a party thereto. In effect, the action is to determine the rights of adverse claimants to a sum of money and is in the nature of an action of interpleader. Respondent, as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Deering v. . SchreyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Hasberg v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Dennin v. PowersNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Port v. HolzingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Community Volunteer Fire Co. v. City National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Abate v. Bushwigk Savings BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1955
  3. First National Bank of Portland v. NobleOregon Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API