Legal Opinion

Thurston v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 13, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Devin, J., at October Term, 1913, OÍ ALAMANCE.

1Opinion of the CourtOlaRK, C. J.

These four cases were begun before a justice of the peace to recover overcharges for freight paid on cotton shipped from points outside of the State to points within the State, and the penalties prescribed by Revisal, 2644, for failure to refund such overcharge within the time prescribed by Revisal, 2643.

In each of the four cases the jury found the amount of the overcharge to be as claimed by the plaiiltiff, and it 'was not contradicted that said overcharges had not been repaid, though application had been made in the manner required by Revisal, 2643, and that if the plaintiff was entitled to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. MazurskySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Efland v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Morris-Scarboro-Moffitt Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Hockfield v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Macon County Supply Co. v. Tallulah Falls RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Supply Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API