Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Harrington Wells & Rhodes, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 7, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action commenced pursuant to CPLR 3213 in which the moving and answering papers were deemed the complaint and the answer, the defendants Josephine Stockli-Napolitano and Vincent Napolitano appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated March 31, 1999, as denied their cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The three plaintiffs made separate loans to the corporate defendant, Harrington Wells & Rhodes, Ltd. Each of the loans was secured by a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin Roofing, Inc. v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ehmer Forest Hills Corp. v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Bart v. TellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Biener Contracting Corp. v. Elberon Restaurant Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Levy v. SchnaderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Villnave Constr. Servs., Inc. v. Crossgates Mall Gen. Co. Newco, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Mickey Bigg & Sons Quality Auto Body, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003