Legal Opinion
Parrish v. Mullis
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 1, 1984No. AY-104PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
458 So.2d 401 (1984)
Norene PARRISH, Appellant,
v.
O. Lee MULLIS, M.D., Appellee.
No. AY-104.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
November 1, 1984.
W. Dexter Douglass of Douglass, Davey, Cooper & Coppins, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Richard Smoak and Jeffrey P. Whitton of Sale, Brown & Smoak, Chartered, Panama City, for appellee.
WIGGINTON, Judge.
Appellant was an unsuccessful plaintiff in a medical malpractice action. Following the trial, appellee moved for an award of attorney's fees pursuant to section 768.56(1), Florida Statutes (1983).[1] Appellant challenged the motion on several…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Love v. JacobsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Stillwell v. ThigpenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Renelt v. KlineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3Cited by10 opinions
- Young v. AltenhausSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- L. ROSS v. RW Roberts Const. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Richardson v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
- Cato v. West Florida Hosp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Frankowitz v. PropstDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.